Quote:
Originally Posted by The SMG
I'm sniffing around a few potential gigs at the moment but one thing that's putting me off making a firm decision is the frequency of agency payments. Granted I've been off the market for a while as my current contract has lasted much longer than I expected but when the h3ll did agencies start paying 28 days???!!!
I've been paid on a weekly basis more or less for the last 5 years so why should that change now? I appreciate that agencies need to manage their cash flow in the current climate but most upper contracts (if you ever read them) explicitly state that the client must pay the agency within 14 days. Also, apart from 'putting the deal together', agencies taking c 20% margin (and upwards) have already factored the cash flow risk into their margins. So why should they be tinkering with the frequency of my payments?
Am I being a little sensitive or is this the norm?
|
Sadly, this does seem to be the norm in some fields, perhaps not so in other fields. You are right to be sensitive about it too, particularly if the recruiter doesn't pay or goes under because it increases your risks.
I think you can now buy insurance that protects you against the risk of a recruiter not paying.